Page 88 - Nick Begich - Angels Don't Play This Haarp Advances in Tesla Technology

www.earthpulse.com 81 www.earthpulse.com
He replied that he would not be so naive as just to say "yes, if they stimulate
the ionosphere in this way then they're going to set off earthquakes. However, I
would not be so cavalier as to say that if they happen to stimulate the ionosphere at a
moment when it is already saturated, or near saturation, that they couldn't set off an
event that could induce chaos - where you could end up having a kind of magnetic
storming, almost a runaway event up there."

In documents the HAARP planners put together in 1990 they say that they
were intentionally trying to get a "runaway" effect in the ionosphere. This effect was
new and would represent an energy threshold not yet reached with these kinds of
military tools. The document said "...that at the highest HF (high frequency) powers
available in the West, the instabilities commonly studied are approaching (heir
maximum RF (radio frequency) energy dissipative capability, beyond which the
plasma processes will 'runaway' until the next limiting factor is reached."120 What
will happen when this runaway event occurs?

Trombly pointed out a similarity between the decision to pulse several
gigawatts into the ionosphere (HAARP) without knowing what will happen, and the
first atomic weapon testing. Years afteT that test, physicist Robert Oppenheimer
admitted that the scientists had not known what would happen when they set off the
bomb - if the chain reaction was going to stop or keep on going. "The government
knew that the scientists didn't know!"

More recently, spectrum analysis work, especially in the ultra low frequency
(ULF) part of the electromagnetic spectrum, has clearly shown how non-linear the
effects from underground nuclear testing were, Trombly said. (Nonlinear means
having an output that is not directly proportional to the input. In other words,
unexpected or unpredictable.) Scientists were completely surprised by these results -
they represented many many times the expected effect.
HAARP: DANGEROUS EXPERIMENT

Manning commented that Dr. Bernard Eastlund, the inventor of an
ionospheric heater technology which may be a precursor to HAARP, claims the
ionospheric heater approach could change the chemistry of the ionosphere
beneficially. Trombly indicated there were safer ways to increase the ozone content.

"My knee-jerk reaction is still the same," he said. "With a system as close
to saturation as it is, why would 1 believe this guy when he says that by beaming this
into the ionosphere we're going to be able to heal it? I also don't want to be dogmatic
and say it can't work, if it is done properly. But it just doesn't seem like a wise and
prudent act to me."
Trombly sounded discouraged. He and his colleagues at the non-profit
Institute for Advanced Studies use any money that they get from clients for further
research. However, he would consider their efforts a waste of time if the people
with
120 HAARP HF Active Auroral Research Program, Joint Program Plans and Activities, Air Force
Geophysics Laboratory, Navy Office of Naval Research, February 1990.