Page 83 - Nick Begich - Angels Don't Play This Haarp Advances in Tesla Technology

www.earthpulse.com 76 www.earthpulse.com
spectacular hot flashes in the near future and throws even more particles at Earth, the
fact is that Earth is being affected right now.

EARTH GETS HOTTER

"Eleven years ago we were predicting ground heating," Trombly said, "...the
earth actually getting hotter inductively."

(To understand what he was talking about, Manning later had to turn to a
dictionary of science. Induction heating means that electrically conducting material -
in this case, materials in the earth - is heated as a result of the electric current
induced in it by an alternating magnetic field (due to interaction with the sun and
even with the moon). She began to see how Earth's magnetic field could be in
danger of breaking down and opening the way for a pole shift. Heat is an enemy to
the strength of a magnet. (The fact that the earth is getting hotter was reported in the
New York Times in 1991. The article said that Arctic ice had decreased by 2% in only
a nine year period.) 107

Trombly was saying that before men detonated underground nuclear tests or
did anything else that was massively invasive to the state of balance of Earth's
systems, we were already on an unstable planet. When will Earth be
electrodynamically saturated with an "energy burden" from the sun? "The system is
already at near-terminal capacity in our opinion," said Trombly.

Then HAARP comes along..."a project that could further
destabilize an earth that's already an unstable environment", as Trombly put it. The
thought of a planet whose systems are overloaded, and which may soon reach the
point where it couldn't take any more high-energy particles, was sobering. Manning
thought about the enthusiastic attitude of the scientists and military contractors
whom the NO HAARP group called "the big boys with the big toys". Those big time
experimenters admit that they don't know what will happen when they push
ionospheric heating experiments into the next level of effects. They seem to be
excited about the macho adventure of passing the next "threshold of effects" in the
ionosphere, and do not hesitate to pump gigawatts of power up there and
intentionally accelerate particles in the ionosphere to "relativistic" speeds - nearly
the speed of light. Why would they be so irresponsible?

Trombly answered in a word - denial. The decision makers are not being
malicious, Trombly said; they are just refusing to face the facts about how flimsy is
the web of life on Earth. "We do not want to admit that we are in a situation that is
tenuous, where there are gradual (planetary) processes that are punctuated by
catastrophic processes."

Specialists tend to look at their own experiments as isolated incidents,
without seeing long term effects on larger systems, Trombly noted. As Manning
heard him talk about lack of respect for Earth's systems, she thought about a
107 "Receding Ice on Arctic Sea Hints at Global Warming" by William K. Stevens, New York Times,
July 4, 1991, pg. A11.