Page 45 - Nick Begich - Angels Don't Play This Haarp Advances in Tesla Technology
P. 45
www.earthpulse.com 38 www.earthpulse.com
Is it possible that the HAARP scientists could have miniaturized the
technology so that they don't need such a large area of land and electrical power as
called for in Eastlund's patents? Manning asked him.
"It's entirely possible," he replied. "They have had a lot of good engineers
working on it for some time. I would hope they have improved it."
In 1994 Eastlund wrote to an Australian who was concerned about HAARPs
impact on New Zealand and Australia, David White.51 "As we discussed, this
(HAARP) antenna may be a first step toward determining if some of the applications
discussed in my patents could be accomplished. Most of the military applications
require generation of relativistic electrons in the ionosphere. It is my understanding
that one of the purposes of the HAARP antenna is to study the generation of
relativistic electrons."
The speeded-up electrons would travel along Earth's magnetic field lines and
could either "bounce" on a field line over Australia and return to the north, or "be lost
and fall into the atmosphere". "Don't panic," Eastlund wrote, "this happens very high
in the atmosphere,"
"It is...years in the future that enough electrons might be generated to merit
concern in the Southern hemisphere, and that only if it can be proven that such
electrons can be created with the antenna."
In the meantime, Eastlund said, "since I stopped working for ARCO, I have
spent some time investigating uses of the antenna for possible replenishment of the
ozone holes, and for steering the jet stream for weather modification."
When the ionizing beams make some ozone by a breakdown in the
atmosphere, he later told Manning, they also increase nitrogen compounds up there.
"The problem is, it takes a lot of energy to make a lot of ozone." The scientist
planned to continue to work on the problem.
He would like recognition for his part in inventing the HAARP advanced
ionospheric heater. "They own it, but they can't take credit for it," he said. "I was
upset, because 'internal politics' is why I was let go. I went to my patent lawyer, and
he said 'Ben, don't worry about it. It's a far out idea...If it works, the United States
government says you invented it. And they can't take that away.' "
As evidence that HAARP was based on Eastlund-type technology, he said, "...In the
RFP (Request for Proposal) for the project, for example, they stated that generation of
relativistic electrons was one of the objectives of the program."
Eastlund gave a vivid picture of how energetic those electrons are. "The
electron that hits your TV screen is moving at 25,000 electron- volts. When it gets
more than a half-a-million, that's when you call it relativistic. The ones (HAARP) is
talking about are one to three million electron-volts."
51 March 26, 1994, letter from Bernard Eastlund to David White of Production Technologies Inc.,
quoted with permission from Dr. Eastlund.