Page 280 - James Rodger Fleming - Fixing the sky
P. 280

1.  Reduce its production.
                    2.  Adapt to increasing carbon dioxide and changing climate.
                    3.  Remove it from the atmosphere.
                    4.  Modify climate, weather, and hydrology.

                  The first two options, practiced worldwide, with foresight and moderation, con-
                  stitute the “middle course.” “Mitigation” properly refers to a complex array of
                  initiatives involving primarily decarbonizing and increasing the efficiency of the
                  energy supply, afforestation and the prevention of further deforestation, and
                  other efforts aimed at reducing anthropogenic emissions and concentrations of
                  radiatively active trace gases. “Adaptation,” or climate resilience, involves collec-
                  tive means taken to avoid, cope with, or reduce the adverse impacts of climate
                  change, both on humans and on all living creatures and ecosystems. The first
                  climate migrants in prehistorical times were adapting to the onset of an ice age.
                  Ward’s categories of prevention and protection, from 1930, are close matches.
                  Some  mitigation  efforts,  however,  involving  proposed  carbon  capture  and
                  sequestration can indeed be massive in scale, such as ocean iron fertilization and
                  a worldwide array of Lackner towers, and deserve the same caveats as direct cli-
                  mate intervention schemes.
                     In  a  2008  book,  Gabrielle  Walker  and  Sir  David  King  surveyed  the  prob-
                  lems of global warming and some of the technological and political “solutions,”
                  or at least responses that might arise. They discussed the oft-cited “stabilization
                  wedges”  of  Princeton  professors  Stephen  Pacala  and  Robert  Socolow,  which
                  offered the hopeful vision of stabilizing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels (but
                                                                     101
                  not  necessarily  the  climate  system)  using  existing  technologies.   Pacala  and
                  Socolow rightly emphasized efficiency first—in electricity generation, passenger
                  vehicle transport, shipping, and other end-use sectors—followed by new renew-
                  able energy sources and as-yet-unproven carbon capture and storage. Walker and
                  King wrote that stabilizing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels at 450 parts per
                  million would require implementing the following “wedges” immediately:


                     Double the fuel economy of two billion cars, halve the annual average distance
                     traveled by two billion cars, cut carbon emissions from buildings and appliances
                     by  one-quarter,  capture  and  store  carbon  dioxide  from  800  gigawatts  of  coal
                     power plants and 1600 gigawatts of natural gas power plants, build two million
                    1-megawatt wind turbines (about 50 times more than exist today), stop all felling
                     of tropical forests and plant 740 million acres of new trees in the tropics, double
                     the current amount of nuclear power, quadruple the amount of natural gas used to
                     generate electricity . . . , increase the use of biofuels in vehicles to fifty times today’s


                                                                tHe Climate enGineerS  |  263
   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285