Page 248 - James Rodger Fleming - Fixing the sky
P. 248

Fogg described how ecological-engineering techniques might be used some-
                  day to implant life on other planets and how geoengineering might be used to
                  ameliorate (or perhaps exacerbate) the currently “corrosive process” of global
                  change  on  the  Earth.  He  presented  order-of-magnitude  calculations  and  the
                  results  of  some  simple  computer  modeling  to  assess  the  plausibility  of  vari-
                  ous  planetary-engineering  scenarios.  He  deemed  it  “rash  to  proclaim”  impos-
                  sible any scheme that does not “obviously violate the laws of physics.” Yet Fogg
                  focused only on possibilities, not on unintended consequences, and left unad-
                  dressed questions of whether the schemes are desirable, or even ethical. Accord-
                  ing to Fogg, geoengineering is not simply, or even primarily, a technical prob-
                  lem because people, their politics, and their infrastructures get in the way. That
                  is,  it  involves  the  implications  and  dangers  of  attempting  to  tamper  with  an
                  immensely complex biosphere on an inhabited planet.
                    The epigraph of Fogg’s book cites Hungarian-born engineer and physicist
                  Theodore von Kármán to the effect that “scientists study the world as it is;
                  engineers create the world that has never been.” This quote has an ominous
                  ring, however, when it comes to terraforming, since some “worlds” perhaps
                  should never be. Fogg traced inspiration for the field to olaf Stapleton’s Last
                  and First Men (1930), Robert Heinlein’s Farmer in the Sky (1950), and James
                  Lovelock and Michael Allaby’s The Greening of Mars (1984). In his “concise
                  history of terraforming,” Fogg mentioned the work of naturalists John Ray
                  (English,  seventeenth  century)  and  Georges-Louis  Leclerc,  Comte  de  Buf-
                  fon  (French,  eighteenth  century),  who  looked  on  the  Earth  as  unfinished,
                  with man taking the role of a junior partner in creation, taming the wilder-
                                                                 19
                  ness as part of a historical progression toward “perfection.”  From there, Fogg
                  dropped the names of George Perkins Marsh (1801–1882), an American dip-
                  lomat  and  naturalist  who  wrote  about  replanting  forests,  channeling  rivers,
                  and reclaiming deserts in Man and Nature (1864); Vladimir Vernadsky (1863–
                  1945), the Russian mineralogist and geochemist who popularized the notion
                  of the interconnectedness of the “biosphere”; and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
                  (1881–1955),  the  French  cleric  and  philosopher  who  placed  the  “noosphere,”
                  the realm of human thought, in evolutionary succession to the geosphere and
                  the biosphere.
                     Such expansive antecedents belie recent attempts to restrict the definition of
                  geoengineering to the purposeful and large-scale alteration of the shortwave side
                  of the Earth’s energy budget with the intent of affecting climate. In the litera-
                  ture of planetary terraformation, geoengineering is much, much more than that.
                  It  comprises  macro-scale  projects  to  control  not  only  the  supposed  relatively
                  simple and straightforward interaction of albedo and temperature but also much


                                                                tHe Climate enGineerS  |  231
   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253