Page 247 - James Rodger Fleming - Fixing the sky
P. 247

files or networks. Hackers typically have “big projects” about which they obsess.
                   one project of the computer climate engineers is to cut off the sunbeams in a
                   simple climate model to “prove” that the Earth will cool and sea ice will grow.
                   Much more sophisticated modelers have shown that the unknown consequences
                   of doing this may be very, very serious. When people propose to cool the Earth
                   by 2°C (3.6°F) using a technical fix, they are overlooking the fact that Earth has
                   not yet warmed 2°C in the past century. So we are really dealing with dangerous
                   speculation about speculation. A more apt term might be “geohacking,” which
                   is hopefully harmless enough if the practice is restricted to tinkering with com-
                   puter models and never “sees the light of day” in the form of potentially danger-
                   ous outdoor demonstration projects or planetary-scale tinkering.
                     Placing his faith firmly in progress, engineer and policy analyst David Keith
                   is of the opinion that scientific understanding grants us increased Archimedean
                   leverage and an “ever greater capability to deliberately engineer environmental
                   processes on a planetary scale.”  Echoing William Suddards Franklin and his
                                            14
                   grasshopper of long ago or Ross Hoffman and his misunderstanding of the but-
                   terfly effect, Keith maintains that “accurate knowledge of the atmospheric state
                   and its stability could permit leverage of small, targeted perturbations to effect
                   proportionately larger alterations of the atmospheric dynamics.”  But no mat-
                                                                      15
                   ter how great the scientific wizardry, the modern Archimedes still has no place
                   to stand, no acceptable lever or fulcrum, and no way to predict where the Earth
                   will roll if tipped. Failing ultimate control, geoengineering may indeed have the
                   potential to enrage the chaotic “climate beast” of the influential geochemist and
                   oceanographer Wallace Broecker. 16




                   terraforming and beyond
                   Geoengineering is a subset of “terraforming,” or the engineering of planetary
                   environments. Martyn J. Fogg reviewed the history and some of the technical
                   aspects of “orchestrated planetary change” in his book on this subject, published,
                   curiously,  by  the  Society  of  Automotive  Engineers,  a  group  that  one  might
                                                                      17
                   expect would be most familiar with automobile air-conditioning.  He defined
                  “planetary engineering” as “the application of technology for the purpose of influ-
                   encing the global properties of a planet” and “terraforming” as the process of
                  “enhancing the capacity of an extraterrestrial planetary environment to support
                   life. The ultimate in terraforming would be to create an uncontained planetary
                   biosphere emulating all the functions of the biosphere of the Earth—one that
                   would be fully habitable for human beings.” 18


           230  |  tHe Climate enGineerS
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252