Page 52 - Nick Begich - Angels Don't Play This Haarp Advances in Tesla Technology

www.earthpulse.com 45 www.earthpulse.com
As if to set an example of what happens to academics who speak out with
independent views, the three brave scientists who opposed Project Chariot lost their
jobs at the university and were blackballed from academia elsewhere. One had to leave
the country to find work. When O'Neill researched his book, he told a newspaper
reporter later, "there were still a lot of people on campus who were very sensitive
about the topic, who didn't talk about it for years, decades."60
DESTROYING A RADIATION BELT
Milestones in the history of arrogant science also include the three space
explosions of the U.S. military's Project Argus in 1958. Each shot spewed atomic
particles into Earth's magnetic field where they were trapped and spiraled back and
forth at high speeds. "In essence," said the New York Times, "the Argus experiments
produced artificial belts comparable to the natural Van Allen radiation belt (regions of
high- energy charged particles around the earth at between 2,000 and 12,000 miles
altitudes). Thus, after each shot a curtain of radiation - that is, of extremely high
speed particles - spread around the world."61

In the opinion of the authors, psychiatrists should be invited into
thinktanks where decisions are made to "modify" one of Earth's protective layers.
Shortly after Dr. James A. Van Allen discovered the two radiation belts around Earth -
in the International Geophysical Year (1GY) of 1958, two physicists at the
University of Minnesota proposed that a hydrogen bomb be exploded inside that
radiation belt. According to the New York Times, the two physicists wrote "It might
be amusing to end the IGY by destroying some of the radiation field first discovered
during the IGY."

COPPER-WIRING THE SKY

The folksy saying, "what goes around, comes around", applies to what
experimenters inject into a lower altitude jet stream as well as into the Van Allen belt.
In the early 1960"s someone in the U.S. military apparently decided that the
ionosphere had to be replaced because it was unpredictable (dynamic, lively - it
danced with the ebb and flow of charged particles). They decreed that it had to be
controlled. In their mindset, were telecommunications more important than the
integrity of Earth's natural electric circuit?

The planetary-scale engineers tried to replace a ten by forty kilometer
section of the ionosphere with a "telecommunications shield" of 350,000 copper
needles tossed into orbit.62
The U.S. military did not know what the outcome would be in the early
1960s when they planned an assault on earth's magnetic field with copper needles
(each 2-4 cm long). They planned to increase the size of the needle dump in space "if
the project proves successful". Apparently it was a bust; it was hushed up and kept out
of the mass media,
60 Marilee Enge, "Blowing the Lid off a Nuclear Tale", Anchorage Daily News, Dec. 25,1994.
61 Walter Sullivan, "Blast May Erase Radiation Belt," New York Times Apr. 30,1962.
62 Nigel Harle of Holland, "Vandalizing the Van Allen Belts", winter 1988-89, Earth Island Journal p.
11.