Page 94 - James Rodger Fleming - Fixing the sky
P. 94

3




                       rain fakerS


                       Among the many people who “live by their wits” there is a class who prey
                       upon others subtly yet publicly. Their impelling motives, cupidity and desire
                       for notoriety are stimulated by their vanity, and their rudder is hypocrisy.
                       Although it is their business to live at the expense of others, it is not as parasites
                       or fawning dependents; rather, they make dupes of their patrons, and they
                       do this by pretending to possess knowledge or skill of a high order in some
                       professional line. Their victims become their prey through sheer credulity and
                       the predatory class [is known as] charlatans.

                       —Daniel Hering, Foibles and Fallacies of Science






                       “    t is not in human nature to suffer from a prolonged or repeated evil

                                                    1
                            without seeking for a remedy” —so wrote Daniel Hering in 1924
                         I regarding  weather  control.  In  the  struggle  of  the  agriculturalist
                  against hail and drought, that “remedy” was to seek new techniques for altering
                  the weather. When the rainmaker mixed his proprietary chemicals and a sprinkle
                  of rain touched the parched prairie, it was hard to dissuade the relieved farmers
                  from believing that they had witnessed a miracle. Hering called this charlatan-
                  ism an “old, familiar form of delusion”—post hoc, ergo propter hoc—and a weather
                  control, “vagary.” After the hail cannons were discharged with a mighty roar and
                  the storm clouds dissipated, “it [was] hard . . . to convince the relieved grape
                  growers that the cannons [had] not shot the storm away” (249).
                    The hoopla and hype of Robert Dyrenforth and his team could well be con-
                  sidered a form of charlatanism, except that they made some attempt, modest as it
                  was, to explain their assumptions and they conducted their affairs without exten-
                  sive marketing efforts. Like James Espy before him, Dyrenforth fits better into
                  the sincere but deluded category of those who became overly enthusiastic about
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99