Page 236 - James Rodger Fleming - Fixing the sky
P. 236

increased  rocket  exhaust  polluted  the  stratosphere  or  if  near-space  “seeding”
                  experiments went awry: “The exhausts from increasingly powerful and numer-
                  ous space rockets will soon be systematically seeding the thin upper atmosphere
                  with large quantities of chemicals it has never possessed before or only in small
                           74
                  quantities.”  He was also concerned that the cold war and the space age might
                  provide rival militaries with both the motivation and the wherewithal to dam-
                  age the ozone layer. He cited a 1961 study by the Geophysics Corporation of
                  America on possible harm to the Earth’s upper atmosphere caused by the oxidiz-
                  ers in rocket fuel. He was also aware that operations Argus and Starfish, Proj-
                  ect West Ford, and Project High Water constituted recent significant interven-
                  tions in the near-space environment that were accompanied by unknown and
                  unquantified risks.
                    on the topic of purposeful damage, Wexler turned to the 1934 presidential
                  address to the Royal Meteorological Society, in which the noted geoscientist
                                                                           75
                  Sydney Chapman had asked, “Can a hole be made in the ozone layer?”  That
                  is, can all or most of the ozone be removed from the column of air above some
                  chosen area? Chapman was thinking of an event that would provide a window
                  for astronomers to extend their observations some hundreds of angstroms far-
                  ther  into  the  ultraviolet  without  the  interference  of  atmospheric  ozone.  Pos-
                  sible health effects of human exposure to shortwave radiation did not appear
                  to  Chapman  to  be  an  important  issue,  since  the  hole  he  was  contemplating
                  would be localized, probably in a remote area (he suggested Chile), and would
                  be short-lived, somewhere between a day and an hour, timed for the benefit of
                  astronomers only. Cutting such a hole, Chapman continued, would require “the
                  discharge  of  a  deozonizing  agent”  perhaps  by  airplanes,  balloons,  or  rockets.
                  Chapman proposed two possibilities: a large amount of a one-to-one destruc-
                  tive agent such as hydrogen that would reduce o  molecules to o  or “some
                                                          3
                                                                        2
                  catalyst which, without itself undergoing permanent change, could promote the
                  reduction of large numbers of ozone molecules in succession” (134). Although
                  the choice of the agent would have to be left to the chemists, Chapman con-
                  cluded that “the project of making a [temporary] hole in the ozone layer [a 90
                  percent reduction for the benefit of astronomers] does not seem quite impos-
                  sible of achievement” (135).
                     In November 1961, Wexler gathered weather bureau staff for a briefing on
                  ozone depletion and circulated this memo, titled “Deozonizer”:

                     Sydney  Chapman  proposed  making  a  temporary  “hole”  in  the  ozone  layer  by
                     inserting a substance which could be oxidized by the ozone. He suggested that
                     hydrogen might be dispersed but wondered if there might be a catalyst gas or fine


                                              fearS, fantaSieS, and PoSSibilitieS of Control  |  219
   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241