Page 235 - James Rodger Fleming - Fixing the sky
P. 235

in ignorance of its consequences. We are in weather control now whether we
                   know it or not” (4).
                     He was clearly interested in both inadvertent climatic effects—such as might
                   be created by industrial emissions, rocket exhaust gases, or space experiments
                   gone  awry—and  purposeful  interventions,  whether  peaceful  or  done  with
                   hostile  intent.  Echoing  von  Neumann’s  1955  warning  about  technology,  Wex-
                   ler continued: “Even in this day of global experiments, such as the world-wide
                   Argus electron seeding of the Earth’s magnetic field at 300 miles height, man
                   and machinery orbiting the Earth at 100 miles seventeen times in one day, and
                   100 megaton bombs—are we any closer to some idea of the approaches which
                   could lead to an eventual ‘solution’ [to the problem of climate control]?” (3). He
                   noted “a growing anxiety” in the public pronouncements that “Man, in apply-
                   ing his growing energies and facilities against the power of the winds and storms,
                   may  do  so  with  more  enthusiasm  than  knowledge  and  so  cause  more  harm
                   than good.” 72
                     Wexler was well aware that any intervention in the Earth’s heat budget would
                   change the atmospheric circulation patterns, the storm tracks, and the weather
                   itself, so, as he pointed out, weather and climate control are not two different
                   things. After presenting some twenty technical slides on the atmosphere’s radia-
                   tive heat budget and discussing means of manipulating it, Wexler concluded with
                   a grand summary of highly speculative techniques to heat, cool, or otherwise
                   restructure the atmosphere:


                                                  o
                                                      o
                       (a) increase global temperature by 1.7 C [3 F] by injecting a cloud of ice crystals
                     into the polar atmosphere by detonating 10 H-bombs on the Arctic sea ice;
                                                  o
                                                       o
                       (b) lower global temperature by 1.2 C [2.2 F] by launching a ring of dust par-
                     ticles into equatorial orbit to shade the Earth;
                       (c) warm the lower atmosphere and cool the stratosphere by injecting ice, water,
                     or other substances into space; and
                       (d) destroy all stratospheric ozone, raise the tropopause, and cool the strato-
                                   o
                                         o
                     sphere by up to 80 C [144 F] by an injection of a catalytic de-ozonizer such as
                     chlorine or bromine. 73


                   Cutting a Hole in the ozone layer

                   one of the most stunning aspects of Wexler’s lectures was his awareness that
                   catalytic reactions of chlorine and bromine could severely damage the ozone
                   layer. Wexler was concerned that inadvertent damage to ozone might occur if


           218  |  fearS, fantaSieS, and PoSSibilitieS of Control
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240