Page 74 - Elana Freeland - Under an Ionized Sky

stratosphere and troposphere via jets, drones, ships, and rockets.
In short, our atmosphere is no longer conducting natural charge, current, and voltage. Instead,
we are now breathing from a ramped-up amplifier / condenser / antenna built of conductive
nano-metals and ionized electrons. Tiny and almost weightless for maximum long-lasting loft,
metal nanoparticles offer multiplied surface area and attract moisture for generating storms.
Besides attaching to and ionizing molecules of oxygen, those in the upper atmosphere bond with
and draw unknown organisms down into our atmosphere, creating chemical synergies our
immune systems know nothing about. Yet we are forced to breathe this chemical witches’ brew
while the nanoparticles (including “smart dust” and “dusty plasma”) breach our blood-brain
barrier.
Thus it is no longer only the unseen world of wireless radio waves and microwaves pulsing
through our bodies and brains that we must take into account but nano-synergies that our Earth
and immune systems are so far ill-equipped to handle. 4
The military-industrial-intelligence complex gave the green light to nanotechnology more
than twenty years ago, about the time that jets began spewing nano-metals. Nano-scale materials,
tools and devices now exceed profits of $1 trillion per year.
The nano-revolution—like the non-ionized radiation revolution—occurred very quietly so as
to avoid public attention and government safety trials and standards. Owning the weather was the
overarching military-industrial-intelligence objective, not health. Nor was it the first time that the
biosphere had to serve as collateral damage for open field “research” under Section 1520a
Chapter 32 of U.S. Code Title 50, “Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical
or biological agents”:

Title 50 defines the role of war and national defense, and Chapter 32 sets limits on chemical and biological warfare
programs. While the Secretary of Defense may not conduct any chemical or biological experiments on civilian
populations, the loophole lies in allowing for medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, and industrial
research and tests, including research for protection against weapons and for law enforcement purposes like riot
5
control.

It is not just the size and chemical signatures of nanoparticles that makes them a planetary
hazard, it is their unnatural relationship with Nature. Nanotechnology is about taking apart,
reconstructing, and condensing Nature at a molecular level measuring 1/80,000th the diameter of
a human hair. Polystyrene carboxylated nanoparticles are in food additives and vitamins (all
6
FDA-approved, of course). “Nano-enabled products” span medicines, textiles, laundry detergent
and fuel additives, dental fillings, food packaging, and skin care. A campfire naturally produces
carbon nanotubes, but titanium dioxide (TiO ) added to processed foods, toothpaste, gum, paint,
2
paper, plastic, etc., is not “natural” but engineered, which places corporations like Kraft, Nestle,
Hershey, Campbell, and Unilever squarely in the nano-food business. It is not just Monsanto
GMOs that we need to research.
But the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) views nanos as fundamentally no different
from the silver or titanium they come from and so allows corporations to simply label
nanoparticles as “additives.” The truth is that Nature at the nanoscale has far different
properties. Copper becomes transparent, aluminum explosive, solids liquid. At the molecular
level, the laws of physics and chemistry governing color, solubility, strength, reactivity, toxicity,
etc. work differently and may represent a danger to the biosphere. More research is needed.
Both the Center for Food Safety and the Energy & Environment Legal Institute are suing the
EPA for not protecting citizens or the environment from what boils down to military-industrial-