Page 40 - Elana Freeland - Under an Ionized Sky
P. 40

• ​Satellite  data  analyses  suggest  observable  impact  of  aviation  on  cirrus  cover  and
                       radiation fluxes.
                     • ​The climate impact of aviation induced contrail cirrus depends on aircraft properties
                       and routing
                     • ​Both aspects [soot and flight routing] offer the potential for aviation to reduce the
                       climate  impact  of  aviation  [less  soot  emissions,  LESS  WARMING  and  MORE
                       COOLING CONTRAILS].       57


                   The last statement is a bombshell. Schumann is clearly abandoning the idea of ridding the
               world of contrails; he is, in fact, advocating for creating cooling contrails and using them for
               geoengineering SRM purposes. Schumann’s recommendations combine with the recent mandate
               for aviation biofuels in the ultimate two-tank geoengineering solution:

                     Applying high FSCs [fuel sulfur content] at aviation cruise altitudes combined with ULSJ fuel [ultra-low-sulfur jet
                     fuel,  aviation  biofuel]  at  lower  altitudes  result  in  reduced  aviation-induced  mortality  and  increased  negative  RE
                     [radiative effect] compared to the baseline aviation scenario. 58


                   In other words, use high-sulfur jet fuel when we get to flight altitude to cool the planet, use
               no-sulfur jet biofuel on takeoff to kill fewer people around runways. This is exactly what they
               are doing.
                   Jim Lee closely follows the alternative jet fuel (biofuels) and sulfur fuel doping now being
               tested  under  the  FAA’s  Aviation  Climate  Change  Research  Initiative  (ACCRI).  These  tests,
               dubbed the Alternative-Fuel Effects on Contrails & Cruise EmiSSions or ACCESS-1 and 2, are
               focused on how different types of fuels make clouds. The three fuels on the drawing board and in
               the skies are a low-sulfur JP-8 fuel, a 50/50 blend of JP-8, and a camelina oilseed-based HEFA
                                                  59
               fuel or JP-8 fuel doped with sulfur.  The agenda behind sulfur content (FSC) geoengineering is
               to  implement  SRM  worldwide  while  circumventing  international  geoengineering  and  weather
               modification laws.
                   From time to time, sky watchers see “smokers” streak across the sky, leaving behind a dark
               trail. The oily consistency of carbon black or soot can leave such a trail, as can the sulfur in
               diesel fuel. Both diesel and carbon black are hard on engines and are sometimes used as short-
               run solutions for extending old fuel. Carbon black occasionally falls from the sky and coats cars
               and streets. 60
                                                                                                   61
                   Carbon dust is useful to Big Oil and geoengineering in that it absorbs solar energy  and can
               therefore melt the pesky glacial ice slowing up the exploitation of Arctic oil reserves. I already
                                                                                            62
               mentioned its use in HAMP to intensify hurricanes, tornadoes/cyclones, etc.,  and researcher
               Harold Saive (chemtrailsplanet.net) has posed yet another possible objective of “smokers” laying
               carbon black:

                     Dare we speculate this “smoker” is a desperate attempt by the criminal climate cabal at IPCC to raise the temperature
                     in the upper atmosphere to fool satellite data in order to support the failing evidence for global warming over the past
                     16 years? As the dark aerosols descend to earth, the ground-based thermometers could be expected to read higher
                     temps as solar radiation heats the black carbon near the sensors. 63


                   However we look at it, breathing carbon black nanoparticles is bad for human health. The
               2011 University of Iowa paper “Induction of Inflammasome Dependent Pyroptosis by Carbon
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45