Page 181 - Nick Begich - Angels Don't Play This Haarp Advances in Tesla Technology

www.earthpulse.com 174 www.earthpulse.com
While there may be some good effects from this technology, the negative
possibilities are immense. Understanding the planet cannot occur by dissecting the
ionosphere, yet another part of our living system. Environmental Impact Statements
are supposed to be comprehensive and disclose all risks. These documents, and
hearings, are not just some compliance hurdle to be jumped over by the military, the
University and their contractors in their single minded pursuit of their program
mission, These are rules intended to inform the public and protect the environment
from very real hazards. What are the environmental risks which were inadequately
disclosed or explored in the public documents on the project?
The Navy, Air Force and University have not adequately defined the
following risks, nor provided opportunities for public testimony after-ward:

1. Issues missing in the EIS include the possible impacts on the upper atmosphere.
The military and the University should describe the amplification effects which
occur
in the ionosphere when Very Low Frequency radiation (VLF) impacts the
magnetosphere creating a "charged particle rain" (as described in the Navy's research
conducted by Lockheed and Stanford and referred to elsewhere in this book).
2. The issue of non-ionizing radiation has not been disclosed even though the Navy
has cataloged and reviewed more than 1,000 research papers from around the world on
this subject. The risks of this kind of systems' outputs have been explored by the
Army, Navy, Air Force, CIA and others, and yet their research has not been mentioned
at all in any of the HAARP records. Other records from these organizations are
discussed elsewhere in this book, and will serve to dramatize the substantial risks and
potential problems of the electromagnetic radiations being emitted from this system.
3. The Navy conducted international research, modeled after the work of Yale
physiologist Jose MR. Delgado, M.D., which clearly showed that Extremely Low
Frequency (ELF) energy waves cause significant increases in genetic mutation and
alteration in animal embryos. This research may be extrapolated to infer the same
kind of effects on human embryos. The use of ELF in the earth-penetrating
tomography has been acknowledged by John Heckscher, HAARP Program Manager,
although nowhere does he or anyone associated with the project discuss this research.
The potential impact on animal life and people is never disclosed in the EIS. In fact,
it is avoided, except for a couple of lines where the HAARP planners say there is no
effect. When challenged on the issue, they say that the energy is being beamed up and
not down, leaving out entirely the earth-penetrating tomography applications. It is
likely that when challenged on this point they will say, as the government has in the
past, that the energy level is small and not harmful. They have said it is about the
same as that which naturally occurs in the earth. Even if this were true, research has
shown that energy at l/50th of the Earth's natural strength - when pulsed in the right
waveform, at the right frequency - will cause harmful physiological and
psychological effects. The military is not disclosing their own research in this very
important area.