Page 174 - Nick Begich - Angels Don't Play This Haarp Advances in Tesla Technology

www.earthpulse.com 167 www.earthpulse.com
field intensity, pulse widths, repetition frequency and carrier frequency. The system
can be developed using tissue and whole animal experimental studies, coupled with
mechanisms and waveform effects research."

This is what HAARP is, among other things. Page V of the HAARP HF
Active Auroral Research Program. Joint Program Plans and Activities specifies that
the RFR heater must have a rapid scanning capability. Other HAARP documents
define the waveform and frequency characteristics as if the same writer had written all
of the documents.331 It is the new tool for the military in meeting their self imposed
challenge of a "technological race." HAARP is the one-size-fits-all RFR
universal tool.

The grossly unfortunate part of this type of experimentation is how it is
used. In our opinion, using RFR and other energies to destroy human life, as opposed
to enhancing it, is immoral. The new directions of the energy sciences in healing
people and enhancing health are not considered by the military - a travesty and a
disservice to us all. At a time when health care costs are rising, and the threats of
major conflict declining, our government continues to spend billions on killing
rather than on enhancing the human experience. These areas are important, and the
research should be available so that more prudent uses can be developed. If this
happened, we believe it would speed the positive developments being pursued by
those who have great energy and creativity; but limited resources.

Unfortunately, the idea of using RFR for destructive purposes negates the
entire area of positive life science applications. The research in life sciences using
electromagnetic radiations (EMR) is advancing outside of the mainstream medical
establishment, but is beginning to be used there as well. Some genetic engineering
researchers for example, are already using this knowledge in their work.
Going back to the text by Captain Paul Tyler, we can look at the debate
between classical theories and recent research. There is a gulf of conflict between
these two schools of thought. The debate centers on the classical idea that only
ionizing radiation (that which generates heat in tissue) can cause reactions in the
body, while new research indicates that subtle, small, amounts of energy can cause
reactions as well. What Tyler wrote in 1984, as an officer in the Air Force, puts the
debate simply. He said,

"Even though the body is basically an electrochemical system, modem
science has almost exclusively studied the chemical aspects of the body and to date has
largely neglected the electrical aspects. However, over the past decade researchers
have devised many mathematical models to approximate the internal fields in animals
and humans. Some of the later models have shown general agreement with
experimental measurements made with the phantom models and animals. Presently
most scientists in the field use the concept of specific absorption rate for determining
the Dosimetry (dosages) of electromagnetic radiation. Specific absorption rate is the
intensity of the internal electric field or quantity of energy absorbed... However, the
use of these classical concepts of electrodynamics does not explain some experimental
331 Ionospheric Research Instrument (HAARP), March 6,1992, Attachment to contract PR. No.
N00014-92-C-0210 issued to ARCO Power Technologies, inc. pages 15-19.