Page 123 - Nick Begich - Angels Don't Play This Haarp Advances in Tesla Technology

www.earthpulse.com 116 www.earthpulse.com
test many of the ideas in the patents. 180 Military spokesmen deny that they are
using any of the Eastlund ideas; however, careful review of the materials lead to the
inescapable conclusion that the military is misleading the public again. Moreover, it
was reported by Dr. Eastlund in a National Public Radio broadcast in 1988181 that the
military had tested some of the ideas in the patents before removing the secrecy
orders. In a more recent interview, this fact was again confirmed by Dr. Eastlund. 182
A review of the other nine patents originally held by APTI, when overlain on the
military planning documents, leaves researchers with an understanding of this new
weapon system experiment - clearly countering the military's public
pronouncements.

Going back to 1984, the United States Air Force's Major Norman H.
Ruotanen, wrote a paper which became a chapter in a most interesting publication.
"Nuclear and Electromagnetic Warfare in Low-Intensity Conflict". The chapter
considered the use of nuclear weapons for creating electromagnetic pulses (EMP) in
order to disable electronic systems of adversaries. The Major went on to discuss a less
intrusive method and perhaps a method which could be better controlled. He describes
the system:

"Nuclear EMP devices are not the only way to create damaging
electromagnetic pulses. Electrical power supply, power conditioning, and microwave
source device technologies have advanced to the point where one could feasibly
generate electromagnetic pulses in the radio frequency regime by conventional means
that are powerful enough to disrupt, damage, or destroy systems utilizing the highly
susceptible electrical components. "183

"A conventional EMP weapon would somewhat resemble a very powerful
radar system. It could be deployed on a space platform, in an aircraft, or on a truck or
ship. Unlike the nuclear EMP devices that illuminate large areas with damaging EMP,
the conventional system would be used against specific point targets. At long ranges,
the EMP could disrupt or upset target electrical systems. At closer ranges, electrical
components in the target would be burned out and permanently damaged. Both
aggressor and the defender in the low-intensity conflict would have many uses for such
conventional EMP weapons. This type of electromagnetic warfare is quite bloodless
and, therefore, quite appealing when international opinions are
considered...Although this electromagnetic warfare is a relatively benign form of
combat that generally kills systems, not people, some antipersonnel applications are
currently being considered, such as the use of the very powerful microwave devices to
confuse, disable, or even kill the enemy. The use of these advancing technologies for
intelligence gathering, disinformation, and enemy interrogation is even
speculated.. "184
The military planners and strategists of the early-to-middle 1980's were
180 Interview with Dr. Eastlund by Jeane Manning, February 20,1995.
181 Interview with Dr. Eastlund by National Pubic Radio, 1988.
182 Interview with Dr. Eastlund by Jeane Manning, February 20, 1995.
183 Low-Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology, Lt Col. David J. Dean USAF, Editor, Air
University Press, Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education, Maxwell Air Force Base,
Alabama, June 1986.
184 Ibid. pages 245-246.