Page 105 - Nick Begich - Angels Don't Play This Haarp Advances in Tesla Technology

www.earthpulse.com 98 www.earthpulse.com
documentation to prove that the invention would work. The file notes say it was
reviewed again in early February 1987. In late March, the Secrecy Order was lifted.

The Eastlund patent was different than technologies of ionospheric heaters
already operating around the world. The first significant difference was the way the RF
radiation was concentrated. The energy was focused to a point in the ionosphere, with
a wide base of the energy at the transmitter site. The other antenna designs operating
around the world radiated RF in the opposite way, so that it was like a cone with the
point at the transmitter and the wide end in the ionosphere. In other words, the
Eastlund invention concentrated the power in the ionosphere, while the others
spread
it out over an increasingly larger area as the energy moved further away from the
transmitter. This difference allowed a significant concentration of energy into the
ionosphere. The Eastlund device would allow a concentration of one watt per
cubic centimeter, compared to others only able to deliver about one
millionth of one watt.

This was a huge difference, which was "sufficient to cause movement of a
plasma region along said diverging magnetic field lines to an altitude higher than the
altitude at which said excitation was initiated." 156 What this means is that it would
lift the ionosphere and alter its character in the ways necessary to create the effects
described in the patent.
Eastlund further explained the effect of cyclotron resonance in building the
power density over a large area of the ionosphere. The military would use this
knowledge later in describing the "painting" of the ionosphere, which is why they
wanted a system that would scan a fairly large area. They could, with this new
technology, focus the energy and cover a large area for their effects.

Three publications cited in the patent formed the basis for the research into
the technology. It was these references which sparked the original investigation
which led to this book. The articles related to the work of Nikola Tesla in the early
1900's. The articles from the New York Times, December 8, 1915 and September 22,
1940, were quoted earlier in this book.

What would this technology be worth to ARCO? The profits they could
generate by transmitting power from the point of production to the point of
consumption without wires were enormous. Through normal powerline transmission
this was not possible because of power losses over long distances. What wireless
transfers of electrical energy could provide, with the right complement of equipment,
could be astounding. Natural gas could be converted to transferable energy and
literally beamed to wherever it needed to go. Between May, 1994, and April, 1995,
no clear indications of this application for HAARP were found until the other patents
listed in this section and the "key personnel" list for APTI was found and connected.
In the articles referenced by Eastlund in his patent, was another patent of Tesla's
(United States Patent 1,119,732). This patent led to several others which were related
(787,412 and 685,956, among others). Some of these new APTI patents were exactly
what was suspected - a wireless power transmission system.
156 Amendment January 1987 to the original Patent Application of Bernard Eastlund for the
subseauentlv issued Patent Number 4,686,605.