Page 20 - James Rodger Fleming - Fixing the sky
P. 20

ing the planet, saving humanity, and minimizing unwanted side effects, whether
                  physical or moral—is now both possible and desirable. How did we arrive at
                  this situation? 3
                    This book examines historical and current ways of thinking about weather
                  and climate control. It includes stories from a long and checkered history and
                  a  dizzying  array  of  contemporary  ideas—most  of  them  wildly  impractical.
                  It examines the proposals and actual practices of a large number of dreamers,
                  militarists, and outright charlatans, of rain kings and queens, of weather war-
                  riors and climate engineers, both ancient and modern. It provides scholars and
                  the general public with new perspectives that are missing from the technically
                  oriented or policy-oriented conversations about control. This book is based on
                  research in original manuscript and document collections; it also contains fresh
                  interpretations of existing work. It is an extended essay arguing for the rele-
                  vance of history, the foolishness of quick fixes, and the need to follow a “middle
                  course” of expedited moderation in aerial matters, seeking neither to control
                  the sky nor to diminish the importance of environmental problems we face.
                    This history is located within a long tradition of imaginative and speculative
                  literature involving the “control” of nature. Early efforts to exercise some form of
                  control over the environment included seeking shelter from the elements, using
                  fire  for  warmth,  herding  animals,  cultivating  plants,  and  moving  and  storing
                  fresh water. Yet control of the heavens remains far beyond the ability of mortals.
                  our ancestors either bowed or cowered before the ancient sky gods, while the
                  mythological figures of classical antiquity met with tragedy when they sought
                  to exceed mortal limits. Many societies, seeking a measure of influence over the
                  vagaries of the sky, invested their rulers or shamans with the title “rain king” or
                 “rain queen” and charged them with ceremonial duties of vast significance not
                  only for upholding the physical well-being and prosperity of the tribe but also for
                  maintaining the proper relationships between heaven and Earth.
                     Since  the  seventeenth  century,  the  Baconian  expectation  that  increasing
                  knowledge would lead to new technologies “for the common good” has been
                  widely applied to all scientific fields, including, notably, meteorology and clima-
                  tology.  For  several  centuries  now,  planners,  politicians,  scientists,  and  soldiers
                  have proposed schemes for the purposeful manipulation of weather and climate,
                  usually for commercial or military purposes. Their stories have tragic, comedic,
                  and heroic aspects. Control of weather and climate is a perennial issue rooted in
                  hubris and tragedy; it is a pathological issue, illustrating what can go wrong in sci-
                  ence; and it is a pressing public policy issue with widespread social implications.
                     Enlightenment philosophers supposed that the climate of Europe had moder-
                  ated since Roman times in response to human activity. Thomas Jefferson thought


                                                                      introduCtion  |  3
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25