Page 156 - James Rodger Fleming - Fixing the sky
P. 156

tion. In fact, at the very same time Langmuir presented his seminar on pathologi-
                  cal science, he was deeply involved in making highly dubious and unsupportable
                  claims for the efficacy of cloud seeding in creating rain, otherwise modifying the
                  weather, and perhaps even altering the climate. We can thus add one final criterion
                  supporting pathological outcomes that Langmuir did not mention in his lecture—
                  over-reliance on the credentials of a scientist, for example a Nobel laureate, instead
                         3
                  of proof.  When Robert N. Hall transcribed Langmuir’s talk, he added, editorially,
                 “Pathological science is by no means a thing of the past. In fact, a number of examples
                  can be found among current literature, and it is reasonable to suppose that the inci-
                  dence of this kind of ‘science’ will increase at least linearly with the increase in scien-
                            4
                  tific activity.”  If Langmuir’s lecture were to be given today, one might include such
                  pathologies as polywater, an illusory form of water promoted by Soviet physicists
                  Nikolai Fedyakin and Boris Derjaguin in the 1960s, and cold fusion, purportedly
                  discovered by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons in 1989. A 2008 Purdue Uni-
                  versity report on “bubble” fusion contained the following line about the misconduct
                  and unsustainable claims of one of the school’s physicists, who publicly purported to
                  have produced nuclear energy in a tabletop experiment by making tiny bubbles col-
                  lapse: “From small beginnings there developed a tangled web of wishful thinking, sci-
                  entific misjudgment, institutional lapses and human failings.”  This is pathological
                                                                5
                  science. Langmuir’s obsessive and unbridled enthusiasm for weather control and his
                  unsubstantiated claims for it represented a serious lapse in judgment. Thus his final,
                  major undertaking—his foray into weather control—deserves to be scrutinized in
                  light of the criteria developed in his own lectures on pathological science.




                  blowing Smoke

                  During World War II, General Electric held contracts with the National Defense
                  Research Council, the office of Scientific Research and Development (oSRD),
                  the Chemical Warfare Service, and the U.S. Army Air Force for research on gas
                  mask filters, screening smokes, aircraft icing studies, precipitation static, and other
                  aspects of what came to be known as aerosol or “cloud” physics. In 1941, follow-
                  ing German successes in using a smoke generator to hide the battleship Bismarck
                  in the fjords of Norway, Langmuir asked his associate Schaefer to enlarge a small
                  smoke generator he had built under military contract for testing air filters for gas
                  masks. Using a mercury diffusion pump originally designed by Langmuir attached
                  to a pot of boiling oil, Schaefer proceeded to “smoke up the whole room,” getting
                  him into trouble with his laboratory neighbors and with the local fire department
                  when he tested it, without advance notice, on the laboratory roof. 6


                                                                 PatHoloGiCal SCienCe  |  139
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161