Page 149 - James Rodger Fleming - Fixing the sky
P. 149

the aftermath of fido

                   FIDo  proved  to  be  one  of  the  innovation  success  stories  of  World  War  II.
                   It  was  a  crash  research  program  that  became  operational;  it  saved  lives  and
                   equipment; and it definitely gave the edge to Allied aviation during the last two
                   years of the war. But FIDo was feasible only under the desperate conditions of
                   wartime. Bomber Command, its chief beneficiary, credited it with introducing a
                  “revolutionary change in the air war,” but its success was never replicated. When
                   the FIDo system was ignited at an airfield, up to 6,000 gallons of gasoline were
                   burned during the time required to land one aircraft. By comparison, a Mos-
                   quito bomber might burn between 10 and 20 gallons of fuel during its landing
                   approach. It is estimated that during the two and a half years that FIDo was in
                   operation, airfields that used it consumed a total of 30 million gallons of gasoline.
                   Such expenditures were justifiable only when national survival was at stake. Iron-
                   ically, FIDo’s success was due in large part to the brilliant but modest British
                   defense engineer Guy Stewart Callendar, who was the first scientist to attribute
                   the enhanced greenhouse effect to the burning of fossil fuels, who designed key
                   components of the system (including the trench burners), and who was one of
                   the patent holders on the massive FIDo fuel burner. 49
                     After the war, a FIDo system was planned for London’s Heathrow Airport,
                   but it was never installed. For a time, FIDo systems were maintained at the
                   Blackbushe and Manston RAF bases, but according to one 1957 estimate, the cost
                   of running a FIDo installation was prohibitively expensive—₤44,500 an hour.
                   Experiments using jet engines installed along runways to heat and disperse fog
                   at orly Airport near Paris and in Nanyuan, China, met with mixed results. The
                   main technique for dealing with fog, developed after the war, was not weather or
                   cloud modification but the widespread use of instrumented landing techniques. 50



                   the airs of the future


                   on July 11, 1934, Willis R. Gregg, chief of the U.S. Weather Bureau, presided over
                   the dedication ceremony at the air-conditioned house at the Century of Progress
                   World’s Fair in Chicago. It was the Midwest’s hottest summer to date, with tem-
                                                          o
                                                     o
                   peratures that day in St. Louis reaching 100 F (38 C), but Chicago, cooled by a
                                                               o
                                                                    o
                   breeze from Lake Michigan, reached only a moderate 82 F (28 C). It was a dust
                   bowl year, with little rain and the average regional temperatures soaring 5 to 10
                   degrees above normal. Gregg’s theme, broadcast over NBC Radio, was weather
                   control, and he began by discounting the “fantastic methods” of the professional

           132  |  foGGy tHinkinG
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154