Page 101 - James Rodger Fleming - Fixing the sky
P. 101

weather  modification  practices.  In  1926  William  Jackson  Humphreys  deni-
                   grated the practice in the epigraph of his book: “Trying to avert or destroy
                   the  hailstorm  whether  by  scare  or  by  prayer,  by  shooting  or  electrocuting,
                   has been one of our fatuous follies from the earliest times down to the very
                   present.” 11




                   Hurricane Cannon

                   William  Suddards  Franklin  (1863–1930),  a  physics  professor  first  at  Lehigh
                   University and later at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, thought he
                   understood atmospheric instability and how to use it for weather control. In
                   1901 he proposed to do something about hurricanes before they made landfall
                   by  exploding  charges  of  gunpowder  to  initiate  convection  and  thus  dissipate
                   a storm’s source of energy before it could intensify. For Franklin, it was just an
                   idea: “Please don’t think that I have the machinery all designed and constructed
                   to put this idea into effect. In fact I have made no experiments and do not know
                   if the plan is at all practical.” 12
                     Franklin speculated about controlling the weather by using small amounts of
                   judiciously placed energy. Just as an unstable brick chimney might collapse in a
                   gust of wind, so, in an unstable atmosphere, it might be possible to trigger storms
                   by exploding 5 to 10 tons of powder. Using the domino effect as a metaphor, he
                   pointed out how turning a “number of grasshoppers” loose in a room full of
                                                        13
                   dominos would surely result in their collapse.  Franklin was convinced that
                   the atmosphere also responded to what he called “impetuous processes,” such as
                   a single spark causing a raging fire or the movement of a single insect setting off
                   a storm:


                     Imagine a warm layer of air near the ground overlaid with cold air. Such a condi-
                     tion of the atmosphere is unstable, and any disturbance, however minute, may con-
                     ceivably start a general collapse. Thus a grasshopper in Idaho might conceivably ini-
                     tiate a storm movement, which would sweep across the continent and destroy New
                     York City, or a fly in Arizona might initiate a storm movement, which would sweep
                     out harmlessly into the Gulf of Mexico. These results are different surely, and the
                     grasshopper and the fly may be of entirely unheard-of varieties, more minute and
                     insignificant than anything assignable. Infinitesimal differences in the earlier stages
                     of an impetuous process may, therefore, lead to finite differences in the final trend
                     of the process. 14




            84  |  rain fakerS
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106