Page 207 - Elana Freeland - Under an Ionized Sky
P. 207

populations; or by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person . . .


                   Of  course,  HR2977  was  not  allowed  to  see  the  light  of  day  because  exotic  “nonlethal”
               weapons  were  exactly  what  were  being  “tested”  for  military  peace  support  operations  (PSO)
               —“peacemaking,  peace  enforcement  and  peace  building”  being  Orwellian  for  the  covert
               technocracy that would supplant human society in the name of progress.
                   Technocracy means rule by technology. The term was born in 1932 with the Technocracy,
               Inc.  movement.  Inspired  by  IBM  (then  collaborating  with  the  Nazis),  geoscientist  M.  King
               Hubbert  (1903–1989)  sought  to  measure  and  profile  energy  production,  conversion,  flow  of
               goods and services, and consumption. Patrick Wood, author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan
               Horse of Global Transformation (2015), puts it more succinctly: “Technocracy is a totalitarian
               system of government where scientists, engineers and technicians monitor and control all facets
               of personal and civic life—economic, social and political.” 1
                   In 1970, geostrategist Zbigniew Brzezinski—adviser to four administrations, including the
               Obama administration—prophesied the advent of a “technetronic age”:

                     Another  threat,  less  overt  but  no  less  basic,  confronts  liberal  democracy.  More  directly  linked  to  the  impact  of
                     technology, it involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society. Such a society would be
                     dominated  by  an  elite  whose  claim  to  political  power  would  rest  on  allegedly  superior  scientific  knowhow.
                     Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by
                     using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and
                     control. Under such circumstances, the scientific and technological momentum of the country would not be reversed
                     but would actually feed on the situation it exploits. . .The traditionally democratic American society could, because of
                     its fascination with technical efficiency, become an extremely controlled society, and its humane and individualistic
                                              2
                     qualities would thereby be lost . . .

                   In 1983, Samuel Koslov—at one time involved in the Moscow Signal that eventually became
               Project Pandora (1965–70)—opened the classified Conference on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in
               Biological  Systems  at  Johns  Hopkins  University  by  comparing  the  use  of  “external  electric
               fields”  to  what  “faced  the  physics  community  in  1939  when  the  long-time  predicted
               fissionability of the nucleus was actually demonstrated”—meaning the secret Manhattan Project
               that produced the atomic bomb and inducted humanity into the Nuclear Age. 3
                   Koslov  was  right.  The  rise  of  “nonlethal”  weapons  in  the  1990s  was  pivotal  to  the
                                                         4
               ascendancy of the technocracy. “Penguin”  Col. John B. Alexander, author of the 1980 article
               “The New Mental Battlefield” (Military Review,  December  1980),  eventually  became  the  Los
               Alamos National Laboratories kingpin of nonlethal weapons for incremental aggression, peace
               enforcement, weaponized electromagnetic fields, chemical and biological “anti-terrorism,” high-
               powered  microwave  (HPM)  technology,  fracture  and  dynamic  behavior,  biotechnology,  and
               acoustic technologies like synthetic brain-computer interface (BCI). Quiet, unseen weapons for a
               quiet, unseen war against human society.
                   In 1993, Igor Smirnov of the Moscow Institute of Psycho-Correction at Moscow Medical
               Academy gave closed session presentations for the National Academy of Sciences’ 21st Century
               Army Technologies panel to FBI, CIA, DIA, DARPA, military contractor corporate executives,
               National  Institutes  of  Health,  and  National  Institute  of  Mental  Health  regarding  the  latest
               incarnations of the LIDA acoustic psycho-correction device able to remotely implant thoughts in
                                              5
               minds, even over the telephone.  Smirnov taught attendees how to use the electroencephalograph
               (EEG)  to  remotely  measure  brainwaves,  then  demonstrated  the  computer  software  that  could
               create an accurate brain map from those measurements, after which he sent a synthetic telepathy
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212